×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

Bound state formation is a classic feature of quantum mechanics, where a
particle localizes in the vicinity of an attractive potential. This is
typically understood as the particle lowering its potential energy. In this
article, we discuss a paradigm where bound states arise purely due to kinetic
energy considerations. This phenomenon occurs in certain non-manifold spaces
that consist of multiple smooth surfaces that intersect one another. The
intersection region can be viewed as a singularity where dimensionality is not
defined. We demonstrate this idea in a setting where a particle moves on $M$
spaces ($M=2, 3, 4, \ldots$), each of dimensionality $D$ ($D=1, 2$ and $3$).
The spaces intersect at a common point, which serves as a singularity. To study
quantum behaviour in this setting, we discretize space and adopt a
tight-binding approach. We generically find a ground state that is localized
around the singular point, bound by the kinetic energy of `shuttling' among the
$M$ surfaces. We draw a quantitative analogy between singularities on the one
hand and local attractive potentials on the other. To each singularity, we
assign an equivalent potential that produces the same bound state wavefunction
and binding energy. The degree of a singularity ($M$, the number of
intersecting surfaces) determines the strength of the equivalent potential.
With $D=1$ and $D=2$, we show that any singularity creates a bound state. This
is analogous to the well known fact that any attractive potential creates a
bound state in 1D and 2D. In contrast, with $D=3$, bound states only appear
when the degree of the singularity exceeds a threshold value. This is analogous
to the fact that in three dimensions, a threshold potential strength is
required for bound state formation. We discuss implications for experiments and
theoretical studies in various domains of quantum physics.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 321808; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: Aug. 9, 2023, 7:32 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 9
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: