×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capacity for in-context
learning (ICL), where learning a new task from just a few training examples is
done without being explicitly pre-trained. However, despite the success of
LLMs, there has been little understanding of how ICL learns the knowledge from
the given prompts. In this paper, to make progress toward understanding the
learning behaviour of ICL, we train the same LLMs with the same demonstration
examples via ICL and supervised learning (SL), respectively, and investigate
their performance under label perturbations (i.e., noisy labels and label
imbalance) on a range of classification tasks. First, via extensive
experiments, we find that gold labels have significant impacts on the
downstream in-context performance, especially for large language models;
however, imbalanced labels matter little to ICL across all model sizes. Second,
when comparing with SL, we show empirically that ICL is less sensitive to label
perturbations than SL, and ICL gradually attains comparable performance to SL
as the model size increases.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 301669; Unique Viewers: 0
Voters: 0
Latest Change: July 31, 2023, 7:30 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Comments:
Newcom
<0:100>