×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.
Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Comparing the MARTINI and CUJET models for jet-quenching: Medium modification of jets and jet substructure. (arXiv:2212.05944v2 [hep-ph] UPDATED)

Click here to flash read.

Jets produced by the initial hard scattering in heavy ion collision events
lose energy due to interactions with the color-deconfined medium formed around
them: the quark-gluon plasma (QGP). Jet-medium interactions constitute an
important theoretical and experimental field for studies of QGP, and various
models with different assumptions have been proposed to describe them. A fair
and direct comparison of these models requires that all other aspects of the
simulation be fixed, which is achieved in this work by relying on the JETSCAPE
framework. We employ JETSCAPE to directly and comprehensively compare two
successful energy loss models: CUJET and MARTINI. We compare the models with
the results of measurements of jet spectra and substructure observables. With
the strong coupling tuned separately, we find that the two models broadly agree
with each other in nuclear modification factors for charged hadrons and jets
with cone size $R=0.4$. Systematic differences are reported in fragmentation
functions, jet shape, and cone size dependent jet $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 1008; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: March 17, 2023, 7:36 a.m. Changes:
/u/anonymous
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 787
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: