×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

New feebly interacting particles would emerge from a supernova core with
100-MeV-range energies and produce $\gamma$-rays by subsequent decays. These
would contribute to the diffuse cosmic $\gamma$-ray background or would have
shown up in the Solar Maximum Mission (SMM) satellite from SN~1987A. However,
we show for the example of axion-like particles (ALPs) that, even at distances
beyond the progenitor star, the decay photons may not escape, and can instead
form a fireball, a plasma shell with $T\lesssim 1$ MeV. Thus, existing
arguments do not exclude ALPs with few 10 MeV masses and a two-photon coupling
of a few $10^{-10}~{\rm GeV}^{-1}$. However, the energy would have showed up in
sub-MeV photons, which were not seen from SN 1987A in the Pioneer Venus Orbiter
(PVO), closing again this new window. A careful re-assessment is required for
other particles that were constrained in similar ways.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 12258; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: March 22, 2023, 7:35 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 12
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: