×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

Evidence accumulation models (EAMs) are an important class of cognitive
models used to analyze both response time and response choice data recorded
from decision-making tasks. Developments in estimation procedures have helped
EAMs become important both in basic scientific applications and
solution-focussed applied work. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation frameworks for
the linear ballistic accumulator model (LBA) and the diffusion decision model
(DDM) have been widely used, but still suffer from some key limitations,
particularly for large sample sizes, for models with many parameters, and when
linking decision-relevant covariates to model parameters. We extend upon
previous work with methods for estimating the LBA and DDM in hierarchical
Bayesian frameworks that include random effects which are correlated between
people, and include regression-model links between decision-relevant covariates
and model parameters. Our methods work equally well in cases where the
covariates are measured once per person (e.g., personality traits or
psychological tests) or once per decision (e.g., neural or physiological data).
We provide methods for exact Bayesian inference, using particle-based MCMC, and
also approximate methods based on variational Bayesian (VB) inference. The VB
methods are sufficiently fast and efficient that they can address large-scale
estimation problems, such as with very large data sets. We evaluate the
performance of these methods in applications to data from three existing
experiments. Detailed algorithmic implementations and code are freely available
for all methods.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 168087; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: June 1, 2023, 7:33 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 8
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: