×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

An assurance case is a structured argument, typically produced by safety
engineers, to communicate confidence that a critical or complex system, such as
an aircraft, will be acceptably safe within its intended context. Assurance
cases often inform third party approval of a system. One emerging proposition
within the trustworthy AI and autonomous systems (AI/AS) research community is
to use assurance cases to instil justified confidence that specific AI/AS will
be ethically acceptable when operational in well-defined contexts. This paper
substantially develops the proposition and makes it concrete. It brings
together the assurance case methodology with a set of ethical principles to
structure a principles-based ethics assurance argument pattern. The principles
are justice, beneficence, non-maleficence, and respect for human autonomy, with
the principle of transparency playing a supporting role. The argument pattern,
shortened to the acronym PRAISE, is described. The objective of the proposed
PRAISE argument pattern is to provide a reusable template for individual ethics
assurance cases, by which engineers, developers, operators, or regulators could
justify, communicate, or challenge a claim about the overall ethical
acceptability of the use of a specific AI/AS in a given socio-technical
context. We apply the pattern to the hypothetical use case of an autonomous
robo-taxi service in a city centre.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 181700; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: June 7, 2023, 7:31 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 32
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: