×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

We show that the long-time limit of the two-point correlation function
obtained via the standard quantum regression theorem, a standard tool to
compute correlation functions in open quantum systems, does not respect the
Kubo-Martin-Schwinger equilibrium condition to the non-zero order of the
system-bath coupling. We then follow the recently developed Heisenberg operator
method for open quantum systems and by applying a ``{\it weak}" Markov
approximation, derive a new modified version of the quantum regression theorem
that not only respects the KMS condition but further predicts exact answers for
certain paradigmatic models in specific limits. We also show that in cases
where the modified quantum regression theorem does not match with exact
answers, it always performs better than the standard quantum regression
theorem.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 190229; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: June 11, 2023, 7:30 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 10
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: