×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

Suppose we are given two datasets: a labeled dataset and unlabeled dataset
which also has additional auxiliary features not present in the first dataset.
What is the most principled way to use these datasets together to construct a
predictor?


The answer should depend upon whether these datasets are generated by the
same or different distributions over their mutual feature sets, and how similar
the test distribution will be to either of those distributions. In many
applications, the two datasets will likely follow different distributions, but
both may be close to the test distribution. We introduce the problem of
building a predictor which minimizes the maximum loss over all probability
distributions over the original features, auxiliary features, and binary
labels, whose Wasserstein distance is $r_1$ away from the empirical
distribution over the labeled dataset and $r_2$ away from that of the unlabeled
dataset. This can be thought of as a generalization of distributionally robust
optimization (DRO), which allows for two data sources, one of which is
unlabeled and may contain auxiliary features.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 206936; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: June 18, 2023, 7:31 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 8
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: