×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

In this paper, our aim is to briefly survey and articulate the logical and
philosophical foundations of using (first-order) logic to represent
(probabilistic) knowledge in a non-technical fashion. Our motivation is three
fold. First, for machine learning researchers unaware of why the research
community cares about relational representations, this article can serve as a
gentle introduction. Second, for logical experts who are newcomers to the
learning area, such an article can help in navigating the differences between
finite vs infinite, and subjective probabilities vs random-world semantics.
Finally, for researchers from statistical relational learning and
neuro-symbolic AI, who are usually embedded in finite worlds with subjective
probabilities, appreciating what infinite domains and random-world semantics
brings to the table is of utmost theoretical import.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 226044; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: June 27, 2023, 7:31 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 11
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: