×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

Langevin diffusions are rapidly convergent under appropriate functional
inequality assumptions. Hence, it is natural to expect that with additional
smoothness conditions to handle the discretization errors, their
discretizations like the Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) converge in a similar
fashion. This research program was initiated by Vempala and Wibisono (2019),
who established results under log-Sobolev inequalities. Chewi et al. (2022)
extended the results to handle the case of Poincar\'e inequalities. In this
paper, we go beyond Poincar\'e inequalities, and push this research program to
its limit. We do so by establishing upper and lower bounds for Langevin
diffusions and LMC under weak Poincar\'e inequalities that are satisfied by a
large class of densities including polynomially-decaying heavy-tailed densities
(i.e., Cauchy-type). Our results explicitly quantify the effect of the
initializer on the performance of the LMC algorithm. In particular, we show
that as the tail goes from sub-Gaussian, to sub-exponential, and finally to
Cauchy-like, the dependency on the initial error goes from being logarithmic,
to polynomial, and then finally to being exponential. This three-step phase
transition is in particular unavoidable as demonstrated by our lower bounds,
clearly defining the boundaries of LMC.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 285190; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: July 23, 2023, 7:33 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 12
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: