×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

Training neural network classifiers on datasets with label noise poses a risk
of overfitting them to the noisy labels. To address this issue, researchers
have explored alternative loss functions that aim to be more robust. However,
many of these alternatives are heuristic in nature and still vulnerable to
overfitting or underfitting. In this work, we propose a more direct approach to
tackling overfitting caused by label noise. We observe that the presence of
label noise implies a lower bound on the noisy generalised risk. Building upon
this observation, we propose imposing a lower bound on the empirical risk
during training to mitigate overfitting. Our main contribution is providing
theoretical results that yield explicit, easily computable bounds on the
minimum achievable noisy risk for different loss functions. We empirically
demonstrate that using these bounds significantly enhances robustness in
various settings, with virtually no additional computational cost.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 291062; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: July 26, 2023, 7:31 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 8
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: