×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

Measuring similarity between patents is an essential step to ensure novelty
of innovation. However, a large number of methods of measuring the similarity
between patents still rely on manual classification of patents by experts.
Another body of research has proposed automated methods; nevertheless, most of
it solely focuses on the semantic similarity of patents. In order to tackle
these limitations, we propose a hybrid method for automatically measuring the
similarity between patents, considering both semantic and technological
similarities. We measure the semantic similarity based on patent texts using
BERT, calculate the technological similarity with IPC codes using Jaccard
similarity, and perform hybridization by assigning weights to the two
similarity methods. Our evaluation result demonstrates that the proposed method
outperforms the baseline that considers the semantic similarity only.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 29235; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: March 30, 2023, 7:33 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 11
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: