×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

Vagnozzi et al. constrained the additional parameter of spacetimes with a
photon sphere from the observation of the shadow of Sagittarius A* under the
assumption that a distance to the Sagittarius A* and its mass parameter was
estimated from other observations. They claimed that a Damour-Solodukhin
wormhole with an additional parameter $\lambda$ is not an asymptotically-flat
spacetime and that they gave the first robust observational constraint on the
parameter $\lambda$ of the Damour-Solodukhin wormhole. However, they overlooked
the fact that: (A) the Damour-Solodukhin wormhole spacetime is asymptotically
flat, (B) the throat of the Damour-Solodukhin wormhole works as an effective
photon sphere for $\lambda>\sqrt{2}/2$, and (C) not only a usual mass parameter
but also the parameter $\lambda$ contributes the mass of the Damour-Solodukhin
wormhole. Because of the overlook (C), we realize that their constraint on the
parameter $\lambda$ is invalid. This is because their method corresponds to the
following way: They estimated the mass parameter from the other observations
under the assumption $\lambda=0$ even though the value of the parameter
$\lambda$ strongly affects the determination of the mass parameter, and then,
they used the value of the mass parameter to constrain $\lambda$ from the
observation of the shadow. We conclude that we should constrain the mass
parameter and $\lambda$ from the shadow observation and other observations
without the assumption $\lambda=0$.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 302203; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: July 31, 2023, 7:33 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 12
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: