×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

The Riemann hypothesis states that the Riemann $\xi(s)$ function has no zeros
in the strip $0< {\rm Re}(s) < 1$ except for the critical line where ${\rm
Re}(s) = 1/2$. However, determining whether a point in the strip is a zero of a
complex function is a challenging task. Bombieri proposed an assertion in the
Official Problem Description that states, ``The Riemann hypothesis is
equivalent to the statement that all local maxima of $\xi(t)$ (namely, $\xi(s)$
on the critical line) are positive and all local minima are negative." In this
paper, we follow Bombieri's idea to study the Riemann hypothesis. First, we
show that on the critical line, the $\xi(s)$ function (which is then a real
function of a single real variable) obeys a special differential equation, such
that it satisfies Bombieri's equivalence condition. Then, since we have been
unable to locate the original proof of Bombieri's equivalence theorem, we
independently provide a proof for the sufficiency part of it. Namely, if the
$\xi(s)$ function satisfies Bombieri's equivalence condition on the critical
line, then by the Cauchy-Riemann equations, it has no zeros outside this
critical line. Thus, we can conclude that the Riemann hypothesis is true.
Finally, we comment on P\'olya's counterexample against using the $\xi(s)$
function to study the Riemann hypothesis, noting that it violates Bombieri's
equivalence theorem.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 3364; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: March 18, 2023, 7:35 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 784
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: