×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

We investigate nonlinear structure formation in the fuzzy dark matter (FDM)
model in comparison to cold dark matter (CDM) models from a weak lensing
perspective using perturbative methods. We use Eulerian perturbation theory
(PT) up to fourth order to compute the tree-level matter trispectrum and the
one-loop matter spectrum and bispectrum from consistently chosen initial
conditions. In addition, we predict the non-linear matter power spectra using
$N$-body simulations with CDM and FDM initial conditions. We go on to derive
the respective lensing spectra, bispectra and trispectra in CDM and FDM in the
context of a Euclid-like weak lensing survey. Finally, we compute the
attainable cumulative signal-to-noise ratios and an estimate of the attainable
$\chi^2$-functionals for distinguishing FDM from CDM at particle masses
$m=10^{-21}$ eV, $m = 10^{-22}$ eV and $m = 10^{-23}$ eV. We find that PT
predictions cannot be used to reliably distinguish the three models in a weak
lensing survey. Assuming that $N$-body simulations overestimate the late-time
small-scale power in the FDM model, future weak lensing survey might be used to
distinguish between the FDM and CDM cases up to a mass of $m = 10^{-23}$ eV.
However, observations probing the local high-$z$ universe are probably more
suited to constrain the FDM mass.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 433865; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: Sept. 29, 2023, 7:30 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 9
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: