×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.
Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Research assessment under debate: disentangling the interest around the DORA declaration on Twitter. (arXiv:2311.11609v2 [cs.DL] UPDATED)

Click here to flash read.

Much debate has been around the misapplication of metrics in research
assessment. As a result of this concern, the Declaration on Research Assessment
(DORA) was launched, an initiative that caused opposing viewpoints. However,
the discussion topics about DORA have not been formally identified, especially
in participatory environments outside the scholarly communication process, such
as social networks. This paper contributes to that end by analyzing 20,717
DORA-related tweets published from 2015 to 2022. The results show an increasing
volume of tweets, mainly promotional and informative, but with limited
participation of users, either commenting or engaging with the tweets,
generating a scarcely polarized conversation driven primarily by a few DORA
promoters. While a varied list of discussion topics is found (especially "Open
science and research assessment," "Academics career assessment & innovation,"
and "Journal Impact Factor"), the DORA debate appears as part of broader
conversations (research evaluation, open science). Further studies are needed
to check whether these results are restricted to Twitter or reveal more general
patterns. The findings might interest the different evaluators and evaluated
agents regarding their interests and concerns around the reforms in the
research evaluation.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 566813; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: Nov. 23, 2023, 7:31 a.m. Changes:
/u/anonymous
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 12
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: