×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.
Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Maximal Fairness. (arXiv:2304.06057v1 [cs.CY])

Click here to flash read.

Fairness in AI has garnered quite some attention in research, and
increasingly also in society. The so-called "Impossibility Theorem" has been
one of the more striking research results with both theoretical and practical
consequences, as it states that satisfying a certain combination of fairness
measures is impossible. To date, this negative result has not yet been
complemented with a positive one: a characterization of which combinations of
fairness notions are possible. This work aims to fill this gap by identifying
maximal sets of commonly used fairness measures that can be simultaneously
satisfied. The fairness measures used are demographic parity, equal
opportunity, false positive parity, predictive parity, predictive equality,
overall accuracy equality and treatment equality. We conclude that in total 12
maximal sets of these fairness measures are possible, among which seven
combinations of two measures, and five combinations of three measures. Our work
raises interest questions regarding the practical relevance of each of these 12
maximal fairness notions in various scenarios.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 65461; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: April 16, 2023, 7:32 a.m. Changes:
/u/anonymous
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 9
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: