×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

We consider a continuous-time multi-arm bandit problem (CTMAB), where the
learner can sample arms any number of times in a given interval and obtain a
random reward from each sample, however, increasing the frequency of sampling
incurs an additive penalty/cost. Thus, there is a tradeoff between obtaining
large reward and incurring sampling cost as a function of the sampling
frequency. The goal is to design a learning algorithm that minimizes regret,
that is defined as the difference of the payoff of the oracle policy and that
of the learning algorithm. CTMAB is fundamentally different than the usual
multi-arm bandit problem (MAB), e.g., even the single-arm case is non-trivial
in CTMAB, since the optimal sampling frequency depends on the mean of the arm,
which needs to be estimated. We first establish lower bounds on the regret
achievable with any algorithm and then propose algorithms that achieve the
lower bound up to logarithmic factors. For the single-arm case, we show that
the lower bound on the regret is $\Omega((\log T)^2/\mu)$, where $\mu$ is the
mean of the arm, and $T$ is the time horizon. For the multiple arms case, we
show that the lower bound on the regret is $\Omega((\log T)^2 \mu/\Delta^2)$,
where $\mu$ now represents the mean of the best arm, and $\Delta$ is the
difference of the mean of the best and the second-best arm. We then propose an
algorithm that achieves the bound up to constant terms.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 75658; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: April 20, 2023, 7:35 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 8
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: