×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2302.08987v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Urgently needed carbon emission reductions might lead to strict command-and-control decarbonization strategies with potentially negative economic consequences. Analyzing the entire firm-level production network of a European economy, we explore how the worst outcomes of such approaches can be avoided. We compare the systemic relevance of every firm with its annual CO2 emissions to identify optimal emission-reducing strategies with a minimum of additional unemployment and economic losses. Setting specific reduction targets we study various decarbonization scenarios and quantify their economic consequences. We show that for an emission-reduction of 20% the most effective strategy leads to losses of about 2% of jobs and 2% of economic output. In contrast, a naive scenario targeting largest emitters first, results in 28% job losses and 33% output reduction for the same target. This demonstrates that it is possible to use firm-level production networks to design highly effective decarbonization strategies that practically preserve employment and economic output.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 805117; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: March 27, 2024, 7:33 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 11
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: