×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2308.16462v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: We measure the thermal electron energization in 1D and 2D particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations of quasi-perpendicular, low-beta ($\beta_p=0.25$) collisionless ion-electron shocks with mass ratio $m_i/m_e=200$, fast Mach number $\mathcal{M}_{ms}=1$-$4$, and upstream magnetic field angle $\theta_{Bn} = 55$-$85^\circ$ from shock normal $\hat{\boldsymbol{n}}$. It is known that shock electron heating is described by an ambipolar, $\boldsymbol{B}$-parallel electric potential jump, $\Delta\phi_\parallel$, that scales roughly linearly with the electron temperature jump. Our simulations have $\Delta\phi_\parallel/(0.5 m_i {u_\mathrm{sh}}^2) \sim 0.1$-$0.2$ in units of the pre-shock ions' bulk kinetic energy, in agreement with prior measurements and simulations. Different ways to measure $\phi_\parallel$, including the use of de Hoffmann-Teller frame fields, agree to tens-of-percent accuracy. Neglecting off-diagonal electron pressure tensor terms can lead to a systematic underestimate of $\phi_\parallel$ in our low-$\beta_p$ shocks. We further focus on two $\theta_{Bn}=65^\circ$ shocks: a $\mathcal{M}_s=4$ ($\mathcal{M}_A=1.8$) case with a long, $30 d_i$ precursor of whistler waves along $\hat{\boldsymbol{n}}$, and a $\mathcal{M}_s=7$ ($\mathcal{M}_A=3.2$) case with a shorter, $5d_i$ precursor of whistlers oblique to both $\hat{\boldsymbol{n}}$ and $\boldsymbol{B}$; $d_i$ is the ion skin depth. Within the precursors, $\phi_\parallel$ has a secular rise towards the shock along multiple whistler wavelengths and also has localized spikes within magnetic troughs. In a 1D simulation of the $\mathcal{M}_s=4$, $\theta_{Bn}=65^\circ$ case, $\phi_\parallel$ shows a weak dependence on the electron plasma-to-cyclotron frequency ratio $\omega_{pe}/\Omega_{ce}$, and $\phi_\parallel$ decreases by a factor of 2 as $m_i/m_e$ is raised to the true proton-electron value of 1836.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 805672; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: March 28, 2024, 7:30 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 14
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: