×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.
Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Convexity of near-optimal orthogonal-pair-free sets on the unit sphere

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2403.18404v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: A subset $S$ of the unit sphere $\mathbb{S}^2$ is called orthogonal-pair-free if and only if there do not exist two distinct points $u, v \in S$ at distance $\frac{\pi}{2}$ from each other. Witsenhausen \cite{witsenhausen} asked the following question: {\it What is the least upper bound $\alpha_3$ on the Lesbegue measure of any measurable orthogonal-pair-free subset of $\mathbb{S}^2$?} We prove the following result in this paper: Let $\mathcal{A}$ be the collection of all orthogonal-pair-free sets $S$ such that $S$ consists of a finite number of mutually disjoint convex sets. Then, $\alpha_3 = \limsup_{S \in \mathcal{A}} \mu(S)$. Thus, if the double cap conjecture \cite{kalai1} is not true, there is a set in $\mathcal{A}$ with measure strictly greater than the measure of the double cap.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 806025; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: March 28, 2024, 7:31 a.m. Changes:
/u/anonymous
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 20
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: