×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2403.18060v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The cordiality game is played on a graph $G$ by two players, Admirable (A) and Impish (I), who take turns selecting \track{unlabeled} vertices of $G$. Admirable labels the selected vertices by $0$ and Impish by $1$, and the resulting label on any edge is the sum modulo $2$ of the labels of the vertices incident to that edge. The two players have opposite goals: Admirable attempts to minimize the number of edges with different labels as much as possible while Impish attempts to maximize this number. When both Admirable and Impish play their optimal games, we define the \emph{game cordiality number}, $c_g(G)$, as the absolute difference between the number of edges labeled zero and one. Let $P_n$ be the path on $n$ vertices. We show $c_g(P_n)\le \frac{n-3}{3}$ when $n \equiv 0 \pmod 3$, $c_g(P_n)\le \frac{n-1}{3}$ when $n \equiv 1 \pmod 3$, and $c_g(P_n)\le \frac{n+1}{3}$ when $n \equiv 2\pmod 3$. Furthermore, we show a similar bound, $c_g(T) \leq \frac{|T|}{2}$ holds for any tree $T$.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 806869; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: March 28, 2024, 7:32 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 9
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: