×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2403.19556v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Distributed cooperative spectrum sensing usually involves a group of unlicensed secondary users (SUs) collaborating to detect the primary user (PU) in the channel, and thereby opportunistically utilize it without causing interference to the PU. The conventional energy detector (ED) based spectrum sensing ignores the dynamic nature of the PU by using energy statistic only from the present sensing interval for the PU detection. However, for a dynamic PU, previous studies have shown that improved detection capabilities can be achieved by aggregating both present and past energy samples in a test statistic. To this end, a weighted sequential energy detector (WSED) has been proposed, but it is based on aggregating all the collected energy samples over an observation window. For a highly dynamic PU, that involves also combining the outdated samples in the test statistic. In this paper, we propose a modified WSED (mWSED) that uses the primary user states information over the window to aggregate only the highly correlated energy samples in its test statistic. In practice, since the PU states are a priori unknown, we also develop a joint expectation-maximization and Viterbi (EM-Viterbi) algorithm based scheme to iteratively estimate the states by using the energy samples collected over the window. The estimated states are then used in mWSED to compute its test statistics, and the algorithm is referred to here as EM-mWSED. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the states estimation performance of EM-Viterbi and the PU detection performance of EM-mWSED. The results show that, for both highly dynamic as well as slowly time-varying PU, these algorithms outperform the ED and WSED at PU detection, and their performances improve by either increasing the average number of neighbors per SU in the network, or by increasing the SNR or the number of samples per energy statistic.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 808319; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: March 29, 2024, 7:31 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 16
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: