×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2403.19266v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Efficient decoding is crucial to high-throughput and low-power wireless communication scenarios. A theoretical analysis of the performance-complexity tradeoff toward low-complexity decoding is required for a better understanding of the fundamental limits in the above-mentioned scenarios. This study aims to explore the performance of decoders with complexity constraints. Specifically, we investigate the performance of LDPC codes with different numbers of belief-propagation iterations and the performance of polar codes with an SSC decoder. We found that the asymptotic error rates of both polar codes and LDPC codes are functions of complexity $T$ and code length $N$, in the form of $2^{-a2^{b\frac{T}{N}}}$, where $a$ and $b$ are constants that depend on channel and coding schemes. Our analysis reveals the different performance-complexity tradeoffs for LDPC and polar codes. The results indicate that if one aims to further enhance the decoding efficiency for LDPC codes, the key lies in how to efficiently pass messages on the factor graph. In terms of decoding efficiency, polar codes asymptotically outperform $(J, K)$-regular LDPC codes with a code rate $R \le 1-\frac{J(J-1)}{2^J+(J-1)}$ in the low-complexity regime $(T \le O(NlogN))$.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 809035; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: March 29, 2024, 7:32 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 16
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: