×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2311.13590v5 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We consider the problem of finding a maximum size triangle-free $2$-matching in a graph $G$. A $2$-matching is any subset of the edges such that each vertex is incident to at most two edges from the subset. We present a fast combinatorial algorithm for the problem. Our algorithm and its analysis are dramatically simpler than the very complicated result by Hartvigsen from 1984.
In the design of this algorithm we use several new concepts. It has been proven before that for any triangle-free $2$-matching $M$ which is not maximum the graph contains an $M$-augmenting path, whose application to $M$ results in a bigger triangle-free $2$-matching. It was not known how to efficiently find such a path. A new observation is that the search for an augmenting path $P$ can be restricted to so-called {\em amenable} paths that go through any triangle $t$ contained in $P \cup M$ a limited number of times. To find an augmenting path that is amenable and hence whose application does not create any triangle we forbid some edges to be followed by certain others. This operation can be thought of as using gadgets, in which some pairs of edges get disconnected. To be able to disconnect two edges we employ {\em half-edges}. A {\em half-edge} of edge $e$ is, informally speaking, a half of $e$ containing exactly one of its endpoints. This is another novel application of half-edges which were previously used for TSP and other matching problems. Additionally, gadgets are not fixed during any augmentation phase, but are dynamically changing according to the currently discovered state of reachability by amenable paths.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 812712; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: April 19, 2024, 7:31 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 11
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: