×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.
Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Proposer selection in EIP-7251

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2404.12657v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Immediate settlement, or single-slot finality (SSF), is a long-term goal for Ethereum. The growing active validator set size is placing an increasing computational burden on the network, making SSF more challenging. EIP-7251 aims to reduce the number of validators by giving stakers the option to merge existing validators. Key to the success of this proposal therefore is whether stakers choose to merge their validators once EIP-7251 is implemented. It is natural to assume stakers participate only if they anticipate greater expected utility (risk-adjusted returns) as a single large validator. In this paper, we focus on one of the duties that a validator performs, viz. being the proposer for the next block. This duty can be quite lucrative, but happens infrequently. Based on previous analysis, we may assume that EIP-7251 implies no change to the security of the protocol. We confirm that the probability of a validator being selected as block proposer is equivalent under each consolidation regime. This result ensures that the decision of one staker to merge has no impact on the opportunity of another to propose the next block, in turn ensuring there is no major systemic change to the economics of the protocol with respect to proposer selection.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 815960; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: April 22, 2024, 7:32 a.m. Changes:
/u/anonymous
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 7
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: