×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.
Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

In-situ process monitoring and adaptive quality enhancement in laser additive manufacturing: a critical review

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2404.13673v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Laser Additive Manufacturing (LAM) presents unparalleled opportunities for fabricating complex, high-performance structures and components with unique material properties. Despite these advancements, achieving consistent part quality and process repeatability remains challenging. This paper provides a comprehensive review of various state-of-the-art in-situ process monitoring techniques, including optical-based monitoring, acoustic-based sensing, laser line scanning, and operando X-ray monitoring. These techniques are evaluated for their capabilities and limitations in detecting defects within Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and Laser Directed Energy Deposition (LDED) processes. Furthermore, the review discusses emerging multisensor monitoring and machine learning (ML)-assisted defect detection methods, benchmarking ML models tailored for in-situ defect detection. The paper also discusses in-situ adaptive defect remediation strategies that advance LAM towards zero-defect autonomous operations, focusing on real-time closed-loop feedback control and defect correction methods. Research gaps such as the need for standardization, improved reliability and sensitivity, and decision-making strategies beyond early stopping are highlighted. Future directions are proposed, with an emphasis on multimodal sensor fusion for multiscale defect prediction and fault diagnosis, ultimately enabling self-adaptation in LAM processes. This paper aims to equip researchers and industry professionals with a holistic understanding of the current capabilities, limitations, and future directions in in-situ process monitoring and adaptive quality enhancement in LAM.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 817751; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: April 23, 2024, 7:32 a.m. Changes:
/u/anonymous
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 7
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: