babylonpolice.com

arXiv:2311.01519v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Individuals belong to certain social groups in search of a sense of belonging, pride, stability, and significance. Perceiving the group to which one belongs as an "in-group" and other groups as "out-groups" often leads to harmful and discriminatory attitudes. In-group consciousness reinforces a sense of unity within the group and promotes commitment to group goals and problem solving. Identification with the in-group also shapes the social cognitive framework (norms, values, and beliefs) that determine group behavior. In fact, identification with an in-group often leads to prejudice, ethnocentrism, stereotyping, and discrimination, even in the absence of physical conflict or hostility. Social scientists have conducted thousands of empirical studies to elucidate the mechanisms behind these prejudices and discriminations and the social conflicts they generate. These studies are essential to understanding the processes by which group membership and self-categorization create prejudice and discrimination, which in turn lead to social conflict. However, there remain many unanswered questions about howin-groups and out-groups canmove beyond conflict to build harmony and avoid social conflict. According to existing research, it is difficult to establish harmonious relationships between in-groups and out-groups. This study proposes an approach using opinion dynamics theory and social simulation to examine these issues. We examine the possibility of simulating the movement of opinions between and within groups and applying the considerations to cases of social conflict. The model analyzes the severity of conflict within a society with two groups on the basis of intragroup and intergroup trust.