×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2404.13608v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The classical belief revision framework proposed by Alchourron, Gardenfors, and Makinson involves the revision of a theory based on eight postulates. This paper focuses on exploring the revision theory based on quantum mechanics, known as the natural revision theory. In quantum systems, there are two reasoning modes: static intuitionistic reasoning, which incorporates contextuality, and dynamic reasoning, which is achieved through projection measurement.
We combine the advantages of the two intuitionistic quantum logics proposed by Doering and Coecke respectively. We aim to provide a truth-value assignment for intuitionistic quantum logic that not only aligns with the characteristics of quantum mechanics but also allows for truth-value reasoning. We investigate the natural revision theory based on this approach.
We introduce two types of revision operators corresponding to the two reasoning modes in quantum systems: object-level revision and operator-level revision, and we highlight the distinctions between these two operators. Unlike classical revision, we consider the revision of consequence relations in intuitionistic quantum logic. We demonstrate that, within the framework of the natural revision theory, both types of revision operators work together on the reasoning system of consequence relations. The outcomes of revision process are influenced by the order in which the interweaved operators are applied.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 819025; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: April 23, 2024, 7:34 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 13
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: