×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2404.13487v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Many post-processing methods improve forecasts at individual locations but remove their correlation structure, which is crucial for predicting larger-scale events like total precipitation amount over areas such as river catchments that are relevant for weather warnings and flood predictions. We propose a method to reintroduce spatial correlation into a post-processed forecast using an R-vine copula fitted to historical observations. This method works similarly to related approaches like the Schaake shuffle and ensemble copula coupling, i.e., by rearranging predictions at individual locations and reintroducing spatial correlation while maintaining the post-processed marginal distribution. Here, the copula measures how well an arrangement compares with the historical distribution of precipitation. No close relationship is needed between the post-processed marginal distributions and the spatial correlation source. This is an advantage compared to Schaake shuffle and ensemble copula coupling, which rely on a ranking with no ties at each considered location in their source for spatial correlations. However, weather variables such as the precipitation amount, whose distribution has an atom at zero, have rankings with ties. To evaluate the proposed method, it is applied to a precipitation forecast produced by a combination model with two input forecasts that deliver calibrated marginal distributions but without spatial correlations. The obtained results indicate that the calibration of the combination model carries over to the output of the proposed model, i.e., the evaluation of area predictions shows a similar improvement in forecast quality as the predictions for individual locations. Additionally, the spatial correlation of the forecast is evaluated with the help of object-based metrics, for which the proposed model also shows an improvement compared to both input forecasts.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 819144; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: April 23, 2024, 7:34 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 7
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: