×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.
Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Bulk flows, general relativity and the fundamental role of the "peculiar" flux

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2404.16719v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent surveys have been reporting bulk peculiar flows considerably faster than expected. Bulk flows are moving matter and matter in motion implies nonzero energy flux. In relativity, as opposed to Newtonian physics, matter fluxes gravitate as well, since they also contribute to the energy-momentum tensor. The gravitational input of the "peculiar" flux survives at the linear level and it can drastically change our understanding of the way bulk flows have evolved in time. By default, the Newtonian analysis of peculiar motions bypasses the relativistic flux-contribution to the gravitational field. The problem is that there are also studies, with an otherwise relativistic profile, which inadvertently do the same. As result, these treatments reduce to Newtonian and they misleadingly reproduce the slow Newtonian growth-rate of linear peculiar velocities. In contrast, by accounting for the flux effects, the proper relativistic analysis arrives at a considerably stronger growth. We show that it is the flux input of the moving matter to gravity that separates the relativistic studies of peculiar motions from the rest and, in so doing, it could provide an answer to the bulk-flow question.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 822863; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: April 26, 2024, 7:32 a.m. Changes:
/u/anonymous
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 9
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: