×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2303.03627v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Consider a commutative monoid $(M,+,0)$ and a biadditive binary operation $\mu \colon {M} \times {M} \to M$. We will show that under some additional general assumptions, the operation $\mu$ is automatically associative and commutative. The main additional assumption is localizability of $\mu$, which essentially means that a certain canonical order on $M$ is compatible with adjoining some multiplicative inverses of elements of $M$. As an application we show that a division ring $\mathbb{F}$ is commutative provided that for all $a \in \mathbb{F}$ there exists a natural number $k$ such that $a-k$ is not a sum of products of squares. This generalizes the classical theorem that every archimedean ordered division ring is commutative to a more general class of formally real division rings that do not necessarily allow for an archimedean (total) order. Similar results about automatic associativity and commutativity are well-known for special types of partially ordered rings, namely in the uniformly bounded and the lattice-ordered cases, i.e. for $f$-algebras. In these cases the commutative monoid in question is the positive cone of the ordered ring. We also discuss how these classical results can be obtained from the main theorem.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 823186; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: April 26, 2024, 7:32 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 11
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: