×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2404.16528v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: For robustness toward model misspecification, the generalized posterior inference approach modifies the likelihood term by raising it to the power of a learning rate, thereby adjusting the spread of the posterior. This paper proposes a computationally efficient strategy for selecting an appropriate learning rate. The proposed approach builds upon the generalized posterior calibration (GPC) algorithm introduced by Syring and Martin (2019) [Biometrika, Volume 106, Issue 2, pp. 479-486], which is designed to select the learning rate to achieve the nominal frequentist coverage. This algorithm, which evaluates the coverage probability based on bootstrap samples, suffers from high computational costs due to the need for repeated posterior simulations for bootstrap samples. To address this limitation, the study proposes an algorithm that combines elements of the GPC algorithm with the sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) sampler. By leveraging the similarity between the learning rate in generalized posterior inference and the inverse temperature in SMC sampling, the proposed algorithm efficiently calibrates the posterior distribution with less computational cost. For demonstration, the proposed algorithm was applied to several statistical learning models.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 823579; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: April 26, 2024, 7:33 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 8
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: