×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

We present a general kernel-based framework for learning operators between
Banach spaces along with a priori error analysis and comprehensive numerical
comparisons with popular neural net (NN) approaches such as Deep Operator Net
(DeepONet) [Lu et al.] and Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) [Li et al.]. We
consider the setting where the input/output spaces of target operator
$\mathcal{G}^\dagger\,:\, \mathcal{U}\to \mathcal{V}$ are reproducing kernel
Hilbert spaces (RKHS), the data comes in the form of partial observations
$\phi(u_i), \varphi(v_i)$ of input/output functions
$v_i=\mathcal{G}^\dagger(u_i)$ ($i=1,\ldots,N$), and the measurement operators
$\phi\,:\, \mathcal{U}\to \mathbb{R}^n$ and $\varphi\,:\, \mathcal{V} \to
\mathbb{R}^m$ are linear. Writing $\psi\,:\, \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathcal{U}$ and
$\chi\,:\, \mathbb{R}^m \to \mathcal{V}$ for the optimal recovery maps
associated with $\phi$ and $\varphi$, we approximate $\mathcal{G}^\dagger$ with
$\bar{\mathcal{G}}=\chi \circ \bar{f} \circ \phi$ where $\bar{f}$ is an optimal
recovery approximation of $f^\dagger:=\varphi \circ \mathcal{G}^\dagger \circ
\psi\,:\,\mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^m$. We show that, even when using vanilla
kernels (e.g., linear or Mat\'{e}rn), our approach is competitive in terms of
cost-accuracy trade-off and either matches or beats the performance of NN
methods on a majority of benchmarks. Additionally, our framework offers several
advantages inherited from kernel methods: simplicity, interpretability,
convergence guarantees, a priori error estimates, and Bayesian uncertainty
quantification. As such, it can serve as a natural benchmark for operator
learning.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 90089; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: April 27, 2023, 7:34 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 12
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: