×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs), comprising both software and physical
components, arise in many industry-relevant domains and are often mission- or
safety-critical.


System-Level Verification (SLV) of CPSs aims at certifying that given (e.g.,
safety or liveness) specifications are met, or at estimating the value of some
KPIs, when the system runs in its operational environment, i.e., in presence of
inputs (from users or other systems) and/or of additional, uncontrolled
disturbances.


To enable SLV of complex systems from the early design phases, the currently
most adopted approach envisions the simulation of a system model under the
(time bounded) operational scenarios of interest. Simulation-based SLV can be
computationally prohibitive (years of sequential simulation), since model
simulation is computationally intensive and the set of scenarios of interest
can huge.


We present a technique that, given a collection of scenarios of interest
(extracted from mass-storage databases or from symbolic structures, e.g.,
constraint-based scenario generators), computes parallel shortest simulation
campaigns, which drive a possibly large number of system model simulators
running in parallel in a HPC infrastructure through all (and only) those
scenarios in the user-defined (possibly random) order, by wisely avoiding
multiple simulations of repeated trajectories, thus minimising the overall
completion time, compatibly with the available simulator memory capacity.


Our experiments on Modelica/FMU and Simulink case study models with up to
~200 million scenarios show that our optimisation yields speedups as high as
8x. This, together with the enabled massive parallelisation, makes practically
viable (a few weeks in a HPC infrastructure) verification tasks (both
statistical and exhaustive, with respect to the given set of scenarios) which
would otherwise take inconceivably long time.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 301658; Unique Viewers: 0
Voters: 0
Latest Change: July 31, 2023, 7:30 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Comments:
Newcom
<0:100>